My feelings

Recently, I read a novel "time machine", which tells the story of "time and space traveler" passing through time and space through time machine. Although the article is imaginative, it has left me a great feeling. Although the article does not use too much ink to describe the time machine and space-time travelers, it describes a strange future world for the readers. This future world is very different from the future world that people think. In people's imagination, the future world seems to be developed in science and technology, and human beings have been able to live a more convenient life. But the future world is different. With the elaboration of space-time travelers, human beings have evolved in two completely different directions due to hierarchy. Those noble nobles live on the ground, grow more and more lovely, gentle and elegant, and live a carefree and happy life. But just because they have never been bothered, do nothing, think nothing, their bodies are getting shorter and shorter, their intelligence quotient is just like that of a child, and the lowly people, living under the ground, become slaves of the people on the ground, providing them with energy for life. But because of living in the dark all the time, they have become like lemurs and crazy monsters. And their food is people on the ground. Those nobles found the slaves for convenience at the beginning, but now the slaves have become the biggest threat because of the natural law. Isn't it ironic? While reading here, I think, people have been saying that for freedom, for freedom, who doesn't want to have a free life, but "people on the ground" have become beautiful waste because of freedom, is freedom really good? Teachers often scold students for being too free to do what they want. It can be seen that freedom is not right, but why do people praise freedom for thousands of years? Ye Ting in the Chinese Book prisoner's song yearns for freedom, and people think it is a noble idea? All of a sudden, my mother reminded me that freedom is relative and not absolute. Yes, there is too much in the teacher's words, and Ye Ting's freedom is to yearn for other people, and they are not completely free, and the freedom of "people on the ground" is based on the pain of "underground people". It seems that mother's words are right. I think what's so clever about this book is that everything in it is not clear, but metaphor. It does not use the peasant uprising to refute the hierarchy, but through the future development of human beings; it does not use the chaos in the world to tell people what freedom is, but uses the story of "people on the ground"; it does not use inhuman things to tell about the limitations of farmers, but tells about the experience of "underground people". It's all put into a story, which makes me feel very interesting.